Comments on: 64-bit Firefox 3.7 Benchmarks http://test.latko.org/?p=838 A Misanthropic Anthropoid With Something to Say Sun, 13 Nov 2022 02:54:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Chris Latko http://test.latko.org/?p=838&cpage=1#comment-12790 Chris Latko Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:06:11 +0000 http://www.latko.org/?p=838#comment-12790 Not possible. CHUD is 32-bit so the build dies with "ld: warning: in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/CHUD.framework/CHUD, file was built for i386 which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64)" If there is a 64-bit build of CHUD floating around (which I'm surprised there isn't), I'll try again. Not possible.

CHUD is 32-bit so the build dies with "ld: warning: in /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/CHUD.framework/CHUD, file was built for i386 which is not the architecture being linked (x86_64)"

If there is a 64-bit build of CHUD floating around (which I'm surprised there isn't), I'll try again.

]]> By: Stan http://test.latko.org/?p=838&cpage=1#comment-12774 Stan Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:18:28 +0000 http://www.latko.org/?p=838#comment-12774 Out of curiosity, any chance we might see you roll out a 64-bit build of FF 3.7 w/ Shark? Out of curiosity, any chance we might see you roll out a 64-bit build of FF 3.7 w/ Shark?

]]> By: @sephiroth_4 http://test.latko.org/?p=838&cpage=1#comment-12739 @sephiroth_4 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:57:30 +0000 http://www.latko.org/?p=838#comment-12739 Just dropped by to say thanks for keeping us happy and building these! Just dropped by to say thanks for keeping us happy and building these!

]]>